|
So, what are some of the things that a
national strategy ought to address? Again, this is putting aside at
least points for discussion for the rest of our time here. Hopefully what this does is trigger you to
say "yeah, I agree with him" or "no, I disagree with him" or "gee, he
left this out or didn't think about it." This is for discussion - this
is, to start, a series of examples. First, we need to go back to our
recommendations, and ask do we need new ones? Do we need to revise
ones that we have, and this is in all of the areas of immunization,
screening, diagnosis, medical management, treatment. I know there are some people in this room
thinking, "oh my gosh, not another set of recommendations!" But, some
of these need to be looked at, and the question is are we at the right
place, do we have the right sets of these at this time? We need to talk about implementation - and
yes, I wear a public sector hat, but I feel - and I think we at CDC
feel - very strongly that there should be no differentiation between
public and private sector in terms of how we make these things
happen. And addressing issues of health systems
guidelines, how you integrate these activities into existing clinical
and public health programs is something that needs to be addressed. We
need roadmaps for this. Practice guidelines - this is becoming more
and more of a way of life for those of us in the clinical sector, when
we are practicing. Recommendations are just that - they are
recommendations. But when you start developing practice guidelines,
that takes it to a different level. Engaging groups of all levels, in terms of
how is it that we ought to be doing things, is something that has been
an evolution in terms of medical care and public health
practice. Education - both the provider as well as the
public. As we have all seen in the area of viral hepatitis, most
people don't know the alphabet. They don't know A from B from C, they
don't know what the issues are and getting out better education is a
key issue in terms of implementation. Clearly there is a need for additional
research and evaluation - figure out what has been working. Much of what I have shown you today has been
a lot of things that have worked. So let's figure out what has worked,
what has made it work, and how we can apply it to the areas where we
see the gaps. Issues around health services delivery -
how do we really deal with very large populations for which you are
not going to have a specialist taking care of every one of those
patients, and providing both the clinical support as well as all of
the support that is needed in order to get through treatment. We heard
from Mr. Simpson last night that these are difficult, and we need a
system that begins to address this. And then there is a tremendous need for
behavioral research. We have vaccines out there and yet we have a lot
of people who don't want to be vaccinated. What is it that makes
people not want to be vaccinated? And we know from a research standpoint, we
have never addressed that issue. That is just one example of the
behavioral research. And then we have the other aspects of
behavioral research that are needed in terms of a very difficult issue
with these diseases and infections, which has to do with drug
use. And at the bottom I put resources.
Obviously that's been a bit unspoken, though it was spoken very well
last night. We need to figure out how to get the
resources. And it is not all just money, and not all just new money -
but we need to get the resources to address these issues. Again, those are some of the things that at
least need to be laid out in the strategies - and if you have a
roadmap of where you are headed, and those of you who work in
communities know that it is much easier to take that, looking for
resources.
|